Cloudflare defies Italy’s Piracy Shield, won’t block websites on 1.1.1.1 DNS

submitted by

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/cloudflare-…

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

14
94

Log in to comment

14 Comments

Fuck off Italy with your shitty piracy shield


No matter what your opinion is on that matter, Cloudflare is a curse rather than a merit imo.

As we know, Cloudflare’s roots go back to 2004 when Matthew Prince and Cloudflare co-founder Lee Holloway were working on a computer industry project they called Honey Pot. They wanted to close-down the project already, but then, as the BBC reported in 2016,

[Mr. Prince] got an unexpected phone call from the US Department of Homeland Security asking him about the information he had gathered on attacks.

Mr Prince recalls: “They said ‘do you have any idea how valuable the data you have is? Is there any way you would sell us that data?’.

“I added up the cost of running it, multiplied it by ten, and said ‘how about $20,000 (£15,000)?’.

“It felt like a lot of money. That cheque showed up so fast.”

Mr Prince, who has a degree in computer science, adds: “I was telling the story to Michelle Zatlyn, one of my classmates, and she said, ‘if they’ll pay for it, other people will pay for it’.” …

In 2017, Cloudflare also provided services to neo-Nazi sites like The Daily Stormer, including giving them personal information on people who complain about their content.

There are more similar stories about this company than these.


Thank you cloudflare, i don’t use their DNS but it’s a good thing they don’t respect piracy “""shield""”

For me they’re the default, if nothing extra is needed. Just once I experienced a weird network that only allowed Google DNS (8.8.8.8) for god knows what reason.

Try 9.9.9.9 instead. (Quad9)


I use NextDNS, it’s very customizable, allowing blocklists too





Piracy… let the courts deal with it. It’s no business of a government.

If companies want less piracy, they can choose to provide a better and more affordable product.

If we only had a period or a branch when/where piracy was/is comparatively low so we could see what was done then to learn what compells people to pirate…

Na, kidding, better fracture the market to drain consumers for as much money as possible and lobby lawmakers to make laws in favor of huge corporate license hoarders.



Honestly, I’d just spit off their 1.1.1.1 service into some sort of separate company so that Italy doesn’t have jurisdiction and leave their servers where they are so that the CDN stuff keeps working, unless they think that Italy is gonna pass some kind of legislation that goes after the CDN stuff.

I don’t know if 1.1.1.1 is all over. If it is, I imagine that it’d need some kind of BGP black magic to make a single IP address exist at many places on the Internet. If so, and if they have a 1.1.1.1 server in Italy, have to pull that out of Italy.

investigates

Yeah, looks like it’s all over.

For me, the next-to-last-hop is 172.68.188.80:

$ mtr -r 1.1.1.1|tail -n2
 12.|-- 172.68.188.80              0.0%    10   17.8  26.3  17.8  33.6   4.5
 13.|-- one.one.one.one            0.0%    10   21.7  23.2  17.5  28.7   4.0

That’s a North American address, something managed by ARIN, NET-172-64-0-0-1.

This does traceroutes from around Europe:

https://perfops.net/traceroute-from-europe

From Manchester, it’s 141.101.71.91, somewhere in Europe. From Amsterdam, 141.101.65.161. From London, 141.101.71.63 or 141.101.71.47. From Reykjavik, 37.235.49.2. All in Europe, netblocks managed by RIPE and mostly owned by CloudFlare.

Interesting. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before, but I suppose that handing back different content keyed off the person requesting it is kinda CloudFlare’s forte, albeit normally done via DNS responses dependent upon the IP address doing the querying, rather than routing rules depending on it.

EDIT: I think that a bigger problem for Italy is that it’s really easy for someone else to just set up a public DNS server that isn’t in Italy and have it forward queries to 1.1.1.1, and the vast majority of public DNS servers aren’t in Italy and aren’t going to care about Italian law, so Italy would be looking at blocking DNS queries out of Italy, which might be doable, if a stupendous pain in the ass for network admins, as well as blocking DNS-over-HTTP out of Italy, which I suspect is going to be a lot more difficult.

https://globalping.io/network-tools/dns-from-italy

It also looks like all three of the Italian DNS servers this website queries can resolve thepiratebay.org, which I’d think that Italy would have blocked if they block anything on piracy grounds, so I dunno how much compliance there is even from Italian operators of DNS servers.

EDIT2: Apparently some Italian website will let you check if a domain name is blocked by Italy’s PiracyShield:

https://piracyshield.iperv.it/

It looks like they don’t block thepiratebay.org, oddly-enough.

https://piracyshield.iperv.it/ticket_items/4911

That has a partial list of what appears to be blocked FQDNs, but they’re partially-censored, so maybe Italy doesn’t permit people to actually release a list of what they’re blocking (which…I guess would make sense, since it’d basically be a list of places to get pirated content).

EDIT3: And they do apparently disallow release, but I bet that someone would leak it, and sure enough:

https://walledculture.org/academic-research-finds-economic-technical-and-operational-harms-from-italys-piracy-shield/

As the paper notes, one of the major concerns about the system is the lack of transparency: AGCOM does not publish a list of IP addresses or domain names that are subject to its blocking. That not only makes it extremely difficult to correct mistakes, it also – conveniently – hides those mistakes, as well as the scope and impact of Piracy Shield. To get around this lack of transparency, the researchers had to resort to a dataset leaked on GitHub, which contained 10,918 IPv4 addresses and 42,664 domain names (more precisely, the latter were “fully qualified domain names” – FQDN) that had been blocked.

They don’t link to it, but a search later, I think that this might be it:

https://github.com/PiracyShield/RoutingTable

For domains:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PiracyShield/RoutingTable/refs/heads/main/fqdns.txt

And sure enough, thepiratebay.org isn’t in there.


How are we in @europe@feddit.org and people don’t know about https://dns.sb/ ?

First time I heard about it. Intrigued.



The Cloudflare CEO also just paid tribute to JD Vance and Musk.

Yesterday a quasi-judicial body in Italy fined @Cloudflare $17 million for failing to go along with their scheme to censor the Internet. The scheme, which even the EU has called concerning, required us within a mere 30 minutes of notification to fully censor from the Internet any sites a shadowy cabal of European media elites deemed against their interests. No judicial oversight. No due process. No appeal. No transparency. It required us to not just remove customers, but also censor our 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver meaning it risked blacking out any site on the Internet. And it required us not just to censor the content in Italy but globally. In other words, Italy insists a shadowy, European media cabal should be able to dictate what is and is not allowed online.

That, of course, is DISGUSTING and even before yesterday’s fine we had multiple legal challenges pending against the underlying scheme. We, of course, will now fight the unjust fine. Not just because it’s wrong for us but because it is wrong for democratic values.

In addition, we are considering the following actions: 1) discontinuing the millions of dollars in pro bono cyber security services we are providing the upcoming Milano-Cortina Olympics; 2) discontinuing Cloudflare’s Free cyber security services for any Italy-based users; 3) removing all servers from Italian cities; and 4) terminating all plans to build an Italian Cloudflare office or make any investments in the country.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. While there are things I would handle differently than the current U.S. administration, I appreciate @JDVance taking a leadership role in recognizing this type of regulation is a fundamental unfair trade issue that also threatens democratic values. And in this case @ElonMusk is right: #FreeSpeech is critical and under attack from an out-of-touch cabal of very disturbed European policy makers.

I will be in DC first thing next week to discuss this with U.S. administration officials and I’ll be meeting with the IOC in Lausanne shortly after to outline the risk to the Olympic Games if @Cloudflare withdraws our cyber security protection.

In the meantime, we remain happy to discuss this with Italian government officials who, so far, have been unwilling to engage beyond issuing fines. We believe Italy, like all countries, has a right to regulate the content on networks inside its borders. But they must do so following the Rule of Law and principles of Due Process. And Italy certainly has no right to regulate what is and is not allowed on the Internet in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, China, Brazil, India or anywhere outside its borders.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT FIGHT AND WE WILL WIN!!!


Comments from other communities

Based. Censorship no bueno

What about censoring neo Nazis? What about banning Trump from Twitter?

What government entity does Twitter represent?

To the people that don’t get it. Censorship is when the government oppresses or modifies speech.

What the user above is talking about is when social media companies like Twitter banned Donald Trump and neo-nazi accounts.

Social media companies are private entities that you have a contract with where they provide you with service and you agree to abide by specific terms of that service. Hate speech and promotion of violence are things that you have agreed to not do on their services. If you do those things, then you agreed that your account could be terminated. That is what happened to Trump and the neo-nazi accounts (but I repeat myself).

I can agree that social media companies have too much power over public interaction and media consumption but I also agree that a person or organization should not be forced to host and broadcast messages that they disagree with.

Ironically, this standing legal interpretation is due to a right-wing lawsuit widely celebrated on the religious right about a cake baker who didn’t want to make wedding cakes for a gay wedding. The ruling is what affirmed the ability of private entities to regulate speech on their platforms.

Complaining about being banned from a public platform and also celebrating the victory of the cake baker is a situation where their side wants to have their cake and eat it too.


People seems to be fine with corporate censorship, but government censorship is somehow a no-no. I don’t get it. Corporate censorship is still censorship, but it’s now worse. Because you have now given up democratic control of what to censor, and let the tech billionaires have free reign over it. Twitter could ban Trump today, and promote fascism tomorrow and you’d have no say. (oh waiiit, that actually happened?!?!). If you think twitter banning Trump in 2021 is a good thing, why won’t you want the power to vote to ban Trump?

I could be wrong, I am open to change my mind, but please give me a good counter-argument.

Corporate censorship is not illegal. If you come to my house spouting Nazi rhetoric I have ever right to call you out on it and kick you out of my house.

There are laws deliberately protecting the people’s right to free speech that is not infringed by the government.

Now if you want to talk about how we should remove companies/corps rights as entities, we can have the conversation.

Trump was banned from Twitter and it was a good thing because it was them enforcing their TOS/EULA rules in a reasonable manner that doesn’t play favorites. Because the average person like you or me couldn’t say a lot of what Trump said on the platform and not get banned.

That doesn’t mean Twitter is a good company. There are no good companies. Corporations are not your friend. But they also aren’t government entities and they shouldn’t be. So if the state wants to sponsor the internet as a utility it can create its own cloudflare-like service for the purpose of DNS blocking and block whatever it wants. But cloudflare isn’t a state sponsored utility. It’s a corp. It has every right (whether you agree it should have rights or not) to not operate in countries it doesn’t want to operate in.

Your thinking is so calcified by the specific laws of the united states of America it is frustrating. Laws are written by mere mortals like you and me. When those bunch of dudes wrote the Constitution more than two hundred years ago, they couldn’t have imagined the internet in theirs wildest dreams. And that’s without pointing out that the reason they valued absolute freedom of speech so much can be largely attributed to the historical backdrop at the time.

A long time has passed, something better is possible. It’s time to think again from first principles.

Corporations have rights. Quite literally. They are legal entities. We aren’t required to use their services. They aren’t required to provide said services.

“In the UK, Article 10 of the 1998 Human Rights Act protects our right to freedom of expression:
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

In this case public authority is the government.

Governments have an obligation to prohibit hate speech and incitement. These are dangerous. Restrictions can also be justified if they protect specific public interest or the rights and reputations of others.
People imposing the restrictions (whether they are governments, employers or anyone else) must be able to demonstrate the need for them, and they must be proportionate.

The choice for Cloudflare or any company that operates in the jurisdiction of the government enacting the law is to obey the law or not do business in that governments jurisdiction. It seems like that’s exactly what Cloudflare is suggesting they will do if the government tries to force them to adhere to said law. That’s their right as a company.

I’m not saying cloudflare is a good company. My argument isn’t that pulling out of the country is a good idea.

My main concern and the reason that I responded to your comment in the first place was because you tried to make this about freedom of speech, and as it pertains to this discussion I’m not really sure what your argument is except that your idea of free speech is predicated on the idea that the freedom of the people and their speech should in some way negate the freedom of the company.

The threat of legal action on Cloudflare’s part seems to be to do with the fine that the government is trying to force on them for refusing to agree to obey the newly enacted law. It’s normal for corporations to fight civil penalties like this.

Your argument doesn’t seem to be that it costs tax dollars (it does), or that it’s unfair because you or I wouldn’t have the same opportunity due to monetary limitations to legally fight the government. Or even that if you or I didn’t agree with the law we couldn’t just up sticks and leave the country. Your argument seems to be that somehow, by standing up for the rights they do have, this company is somehow blocking free speech? I’m asking because I still am not sure I understand.


Amazing this is so downvoted.

It is literally impossible to discuss free speech online, and has been for decades, due to a tsunami of americans thinking their specific law is the only position possible and flooding all debate with smug explanations of how it actually works, actually.


If platforms aren’t allowed to moderate their platforms discussion will devolve into the same shit-tier content that Lemmy is so famous for.




It’s not somehow a no-no. It’s literally banned by the Constitution





And who is going to ban Trump from Twitter?

He uses his own social media?

Yeah, he has his own Mastodon instance. I was trying to make a different point, though.

People couldn’t even agree to keep Trump away from government, even though that’s a no-brainer. If you react by trying to build a consensus that some people should be banned from social media, you may get that consensus. But it won’t be Trump who is banned. That is a no-brainer, too.

It’s shockingly fascist thinking, actually.




They should be able to talk all they want. Right up unto the steps of the gallows.


When that site has 20+ felonies including pedophilia, yes


You need to read and understand about the Paradox of Intolerance, it’s really important.


Censorship is, at best, a band-aid. And they can always find ways around it. The best solution isn’t to block them from view temporarily, but to teach people to evaluate what they say with empathy and critical thinking.

That is, of course, difficult to accomplish. But then again, there’s no easy solutions, only easy excuses.

The “you don’t need to censor fascists, bigots, racists, etc., you just have to be louder than them” idea hadn’t worked. The world had decades to make it work but didn’t succeed. It is ideologically pure, I’ll give you that. Really nice if you can drive those bad people out without dirtying your own hands with censorship. But I have lost confidence that that approach can ever work.

At no point did I mention volume, I implied education. I actually find just yelling louder to be worse than censorship, as all it does is increase the level of tension and push people towards extremes. Which helps no one.

I also didn’t mean to imply that we shouldn’t use band-aids at all, just that it’s a simple treatment, not a cure. Blocking certain speech and rhetoric can help to a degree… but not if it’s the only thing you do.

The problem with current strategies is that no one wants to go beyond that first step. Whether it’s censorship, or shouting.

You can’t educate people over Twitter. 😂





Banning groups like that only amplifies their “persecuted” persona. It’s best to spend on education and destroying their credibility, which is how we dealt with fucking idiots before we got complacent.


DNS is not Twitter. Blocking DNS is the equivalent of blocking off the street to the pub. Getting banned from XYZ service is the equivalent of starting shit at the pub and getting thrown out.




I mention it to my friends and family every chance I get. I try to explain that the digital walls they’re building aren’t going to keep us safe but I’m always met with tired indifference.

about as safe as when in prison


Yeah the worst fucking part is that theyre indifferent. They dont promote these measures, they just dont care. If they did, a discussion could be had at least.


…until they can’t access some site or service. Then it’s panic.



Are they becoming less shitty or is this accidentally doing the right thing?

They did as sort of positive thing while praising Elon and Vance, despite both their visions of “free speech” as being “free speech for what I like and not you”

So a hearty fuck Cloudflare, fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws, and fuck the entire billionaire apparatus who are so deep in the circle jerk they don’t know how to come up for air and not act like fascists for 10 seconds. 

the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour. 

fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws

Fuck government overreach. And fuck anyone defending it.

You fight government overreach by civil disobedience, not by corporatist overreach in the same manner.

If you give a free pass to corporations disobeying laws just because you personally dislike those laws, soon you’ll find all regulations are pointless because no corporation follows them…

Also, there’s no such thing as “governmental overreach” in a well working system that is FOR the people and BY the people. You elect the representatives, you have a say in what laws get passed. I do agree that we could do with a refresher because the current forms of representative democracy are breaking thanks to (primarily right wing) political false marketing with no repercussions, and nowadays we do have a way to have people give direct input on laws and regulations before they get passed, but that doesn’t negate the fact that the government isn’t supposed to be some shady ruler class but rather a form of communal governance.


Two wrongs don’t make a right. 

I’m with you on these stupid laws too. 


Government overreach (or corruption and enablement of oligarchs) is the responsibility of the citizens.

and the citizens are doing?

Literally fuck-all.





Nah, fuck Italy on this one. Capitalists demanding censorship to protect their profits are never right.

I am Italian and I find Piracy Shield an abomination.

That said, the consequence after the government enacts this should be to see at least all the technically informed people protesting vehemently if not violently.

Instead no, sofa is just too comfortable and pay is too high (including the one they get from public contracts), so let’s instead applaud the Elon-yapping corpo that decides this is the one rule to challenge, but not the next one that is to their advantage.



the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour.

This behavior = Going to court.



They’re arguing that applying filters would degrade performance for everyone. So.. to me that kinda sounds like accidentally doing the right thing.

Seems fairly plausible that they cant change 1.1.1.1 behaviour per country.

At least, not readonably. Dns is the one place where people spend a lot of effort saving microseconds (and less) on each look up.



Cf has always been taking the “freedom of speech absolutist” approach.


they probably know that if they start censoring then some portion of users will stop using their DNS because it would prevent them from going to the websites they want to visit



As a European, I’ve really come around to a more American view of Free Speech.

Over the last few years, we get more and more laws requiring more and more surveillance and censorship to protect copyright, stop hate speech, enforce GDPR, … We’re building up this infrastructure and the population thinks it’s fine. The courts go along and ask for more.

What is going to happen when a European Trump comes to power? You think it’s terrible that Big Tech goes along with Trump? That Must bought Twitter? We ain’t seen nothing yet.

just to be clear, it seems like you are referring to the claimed american view of free speech, not the reality

It is real. There is a lot of hypocrisy, particularly among the right. But the difference between Europe and the US is stark.

Compare the criticism of the DMCA or Google’s Content ID to this affair. It’s on completely different levels.


Are there examples of censorship or prior restraint you’d like to highlight?

the white house encouraging witch hunts is a good one




The US has no limits which is fucking stupid, meanwhile Canada has limits on hate speech while still being far more free than the US speech wise.


Wait what do you have against GDPR?

Similar to copyright, enforcement requires surveillance and empowers censorship. But worse than copyright, it is directly aimed at information about people. So that is what gets surveilled and censored.

Of course, there are positive uses, such as disappearing revenge porn. But in practice, it will always favor the rich and powerful who have the resources to actively manage their image. I don’t believe it is worth the massive surveillance and censorship apparatus, even before one gets to the obvious potential for misuse.

Have you heard of the recent Russmedia case?



Yeah I don’t get that. How did free speech help when the Nazis humiliated jews publicly in the 1930s? How does it help now that the US president says that Somalis are trash people? Nick Fuentes saying the “organized Jewry in America” being a problem?

It seems obvious that I want the state to prevent hate speech, especially against minorities.

How did free speech help when the Nazis humiliated jews publicly in the 1930s?

How did it help taking “jew-baiters” like Julius Streicher to court during the Weimar Republic? Obviously it didn’t.

It seems obvious that I want the state to prevent hate speech, especially against minorities.

You want the state to act against hate speech coming from the elected head of state. What about that seems like a good plan?

You can’t convince people that Trump is a bad guy, and so you want the state to go after the bad guys. Maybe you can convince people that the state should smash bad guys. It’s not hard. But Trump is in charge of the state and not you. He’ll decide who’s a bad guy.




Any DNS beginning filtering anything gets removed from my Adguard Home. I will do my filtering myself. Ads and nazi websites like *.il, or whitehouse.gov for example do not load in my network.

Whats wrong with *il? Its just domain, like com

That belongs to a terrorist organization. No thanks.




Corps are getting bigger than countries and starting to flex. Scary shit.

Jennifer Government and Snow Crash here we come. Except we don’t get any of the cool shit fictional cyber-dystopias do.



Don’t praise Cloudflare or Italy; both are part of the problem.


Blocking cloudflare is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Unless they start blocking IPs like the great firewall of china blocking any DNS is kinda pointless. Unless maybe if the domain’s primary name servers are cloudflare but I can’t seeing any site doing nefarious things using cloudflare. Run your own DNS resolver on a VPS somewhere besides Italy.

My worry is the internet starts getting terribly segmented and not interconnected. That would be more of an issue.


Love to see America taking up this free speech fight again. EU has gotten out of control.

Wait’ll you find out that over half the states in the US have age gating laws on the internet.

The US government knows they can’t turn off the Internet for everyone like they did in Iran.

This is how they will cut off individuals from the Internet



Ah yes, USA - the country with the most strict anti-piracy laws, also responsible for forcing them onto the EU. I’m sure it’ll happily defend piracy from supposed attacks on free speech.


The Ameri-cunt of the Fascist States of America has spoken, we better all listen to him or else…


You can take your notion of ‘free speech’ and your tech companies and shove’em.




So then the Italian court orders its local ISPs to blackhole 1.1.1.1 (which would be stupid easy). Which will end up pushing people to VPNs but still satisfy the court order.


Gaslighting article after CEO of Cloudflare started harassing Italian organizations and people https://xcancel.com/eastdakota/status/2009654937303896492 . Probably sponsored. I expect at least 10 more. Looking at brainwashing today is such a joy. I expect people start defending their favorite company and this asshole.

Can you explain more? It sounds like you think it’s acceptable for the owners of an Italian sports league to have this power over the Internet?

Explain what ? That I can read and understand ? I am saying that it’s not ok for CEO of company to cancel services in whole country after receiving spam email. It’s not ok to call politicians to support online aggression actions against foreign country and at the same time wash mouth with freedom. But well I know you who praise him. Good luck and keep destroying internet.

In addition, we are considering the following actions: 1) discontinuing the millions of dollars in pro bono cyber security services we are providing the upcoming Milano-Cortina Olympics; 2) discontinuing Cloudflare’s Free cyber security services for any Italy-based users; 3) removing all servers from Italian cities; and 4) terminating all plans to build an Italian Cloudflare office or make any investments in the country.

It seems like you are misunderstanding the situation. I’m asking you to explain why you support Italian media executives having the power to censor the Internet.

Are you sane ?

I like to think so. You?






This tweet is fine. Italy is wrong on this matter.

I’m Italian and I agree. Censorship is shit.




Insert image